• Excluding election workers, jobs were up by 41k in May
  • It was all full-time, all payrolls, with significant sectoral and regional breadth
  • Wage growth hit a seven month high
  • Hours worked were flat, restrained by weather, but mildly supportive of Q2 GDP
  • Youth employment surprised flat, females 25+ drove the gain
  • SA factors did not materially distort this report, for a change
  • The BoC will breathe a sigh of relief, but is more focused on inflation
 
  • Canadian jobs, m/m 000s / UR %, SA, May:
  • Actual: 8.8 / 7.0
  • Scotia: -25 / 6.9
  • Consensus: -10 / 7.0
  • Prior: 7.4 / 6.9

I’m shocked that Canada’s job market was so strong last month. That’s not just in reference to the headline reading as the details were strong across the board.

First, almost everyone was expecting a negative and we got a modest gain of 8,800 jobs.

Second, the gain was despite getting the expected drop in public administration jobs that largely reflected the unwinding of the election effect from the prior month. Public admin jobs fell by 32.2k which is consistent with the past half dozen elections (chart 1).

Chart 1: Changes in Public Admin Jobs During the Prior & Post Month of Election

So, take that out, and underlying job growth was up by 41k. That’s a strong reading.

As chart 2 shows, there was significant regional breadth to the gain.

Chart 2: Canadian Jobs Break Down

All of the gain was in full-time jobs (+57.7k) as part-time jobs fell by 48.8k).

All of the job growth was in payrolls that were up by 39.3k entirely due to private payroll positions (60.6k) as public sector payroll jobs fell by 21.3k due to the election effect.

Self-employed positions fell by 30.4k. That’s not great, and there are lots of high quality and important self-employed jobs, but I usually fade big swings in this number because it’s soft data, reliant on self-reporting and with a bigger lifestyle component than payroll positions.

By sector, goods lost 13k jobs, services were up 21.8k. Services excluding the election effect on public administration jobs posted a 54,000 job gain.

Who did that? See chart 3. Wholesale and retail jobs were up 42.8k. If no one’s spending, then someone forgot to tell that sector. Finance, insurance and real estate added jobs (12.4k) and so did several others that added about 10–20k jobs each. There were notable decliners too.

Chart 3: May Changes in Canadian Employment Levels by Sector

Wages exploded. They were up by 6.9% m/m SAAR which is the strongest since October (chart 4).

Chart 4: Canadian Hourly Wages

Youth employment was more resilient than I had feared. Jobs for youths aged 15–24 were unchanged, but it has been a soft four months that still indicates a weak market for them.

This report was about adult women (chart 5). They gained 37k jobs, while men aged 25+ lost 28k jobs. Both were reversals of the prior month.

Chart 5: Youth Facing Difficult Start to Summer Season

Despite the full-time job gain, hours worked were flat (-0.02% m/m SA). No change. And yet they are tracking a modest gain of 0.7% q/q SAAR in Q2 which is mildly supportive of GDP growth defined as hours worked times labour productivity (chart 6). Weather didn’t help (chart 7).

Chart 6: Canada Total Hours Worked; Chart 7: Hours Lost Due to Weather for the Month of May

Unlike the distorted readings over January to April that were artificially depressed by cooked seasonal adjustment factors, that wasn’t the case this time. Chart 8 shows that the SA factor wasn’t a deep outlier this time, as May typically is not. Alternative scenarios for job growth at other SA factors would have still mostly generated decent job growth (chart 9).

Chart 8: Comparing Canada LFS for All Months of May; Chart 9: CA Labour Force Survey Scenarios

While the unemployment rate ticked up to 7% because the labour force expanded by 35k last month and that exceeded aggregate job growth. The UR controlling for the election related loss of public admin jobs would not have risen. Further, the rise of the UR since 2022 has been mostly focused upon excessive numbers of temps (chart 10).

Chart 10: Weighted Contributions to the Canadian Unemployment Rate

I think the Bank of Canada will fade these numbers. Not because they’re bad; they’re actually quite good. But because their reaction function has signalled a stronger focus upon the next two CPI reports notwithstanding how contradictory its guidance is right now.